Not paysite-related : Delphy lols.

[Amazone]

Devil's Advocate time here:

Why do we care?

Seriously...except for running a large, used-to-be-good site and being wise enough to fire LyricLee...what real influence does he have? He lost his best creators because of his practices, and he clearly doesn't care much for the community if he can try to pull scams, cause problems for creators, and not support the anti-paysite effort.

Delphy is QUICKLY becoming irrelevant. We're only KEEPING him relevant with 7-page threads about him.

And his sexual escapades are boring. Now if he was a bit more original, like OpenAssJack....

I think this thread is horrible. This site is beeing discussed on Sims2community, not in a bad way. Things are changing. Very little smart to start a thread like this on a forum against paysites. I will recommend to delete it.

And i am not a fan or groupie of anyone.

[missangelica]

hairdresser? what?

[Amazone]

hairdresser? what?

What are you talking about? Was that comment directed to me by the way?

[missangelica]

hairdresser? what?

What are you talking about? Was that comment directed to me by the way?

No.  MizzKitty called Delphy a hairdresser.  I don't know if she's using it as Danish slang or what..

[Yaardarm Monkey]

MizzKitty called Delphy a hairdresser.  I don't know if she's using it as Danish slang or what..

what???

she was continuing what pixelated said when she (pixelated) said:

"If I pay someone to cut my hair, all I care about is if s/he gives me a good haircut or not. I don't need to, or want to, know about what this person uses his/her wage for, as long as s/he does a good job at cutting my hair. "

that is where the hairdresser part came in

[missangelica]

...that is where the hairdresser part came in

Okay, she didn't quote her.  I didn't realize that she was referencing what pixelated said earlier so it just looked random to me.

ETA: And I made my post right after I saw what she wrote but what the other girl said got inbetween.

[Pescado]

That doesn't mean I want him to make any money, same as I honestly wouldn't want any sick, twisted, scheming hairdresser to make any money off of me and my family and friends. In fact, I'd probably prefer that hairdresser to starve, but that's just me being petty again.

See, now me, I don't care about such things. It's none of my business. If he does his job, I don't care if he goes home to drink the blood of Christian babies and then sacrifice them to Satan. It's just not my problem. I only care about me and mine. If it doesn't affect me, it's somebody else's problem. For a proper consideration, I might be persuaded to consider it my problem, though.

[Heinel]

My personal opinion of Delphy is that he is a sick, pathetic bastard who should be taken out and shot at dawn.

And that's disregarding all insubstantiated rumours. He just gives me that creep-feeling.  

I do, however, agree with Hecubus in that this thread gives him more importance than he's worth. He's just not worth all the ongoing speculation.

That doesn't mean I want him to make any money, same as I honestly wouldn't want any sick, twisted, scheming hairdresser to make any money off of me and my family and friends. In fact, I'd probably prefer that hairdresser to starve, but that's just me being petty again. It's just - all the info is there already. There's a multitude of discussion available for anyone's reading pleasure on this very board on his alleged paedophilia and his schemes to steal money from others etc. Heck, I read most of it before I even started posting here...

So, do a search for it if yous want, but I doubt a new discussion without anything new other than some button with a misspelled url will reach new conclusions.

Just my two cent.  :wink:

You do realize that most of the bad things discussed about him is his private life, and that it is immoral to violate other people's privacy rights like that.. right?

[Hecubus]

Eh, once you have your name in the paper because of a conviction for child porn, your life's up for grabs.

Here's the link to the newspaper article...from our Universal Sims thread:

http://archive.thisishampshire.net/2001/6/25/73971.html

[Heinel]

Eh, once you have your name in the paper because of a conviction for...what was it, child porn?....your life's up for grabs.

(I know we have a link to it somewhere here...will search and edit.)

Before you search, I'm talking about morals, not legals

Morals?  In this phorum?  We're pirates!  Arrgh?

Yes, because the person I quoted before cared, otherwise, (s)he wouldn't feel so strongly about Delphy's actions, just like Pescado.

[missangelica]

Morals?  In this phorum?  We're pirates!  Arrgh?

[MizzKitty]

Missangelica: sorry about that misunderstanding, probably should have quoted but was being lazy, I guess. Tried to post to explain later, but I was having problems loading the site and eventually I just went away to play Civilization IV instead.

You do realize that most of the bad things discussed about him is his private life, and that it is immoral to violate other people's privacy rights like that.. right?

I have no such qualms. His personal life, as you call it, has been in direct violation of any law and morals I know. Children and young teens go to his "family friendly" site. Innocent people have paid - and for all I know, still pay - him to be a middle man for hosting etc. Do you really find it amoral that they be able to google his ass for all the crap he has (in some cases allegedly) done to others like them? I know I don't. And I'm quite sure that for once I'm not the only one.  :wink:

If it was like the discussion of OpenLegsJack and his sexual tendencies I might have agreed with you, because although those details are amusing they are personal. Well, bar the fact that he's been the one making it public knowledge himself.

Doesn't change the fact that I don't think this thread will bring anything new into the open, though.

[lemmiwinks]

"Stanfield, of Quob Lane, West End, pleaded guilty to 30 charges of making indecent photographs."

Source - http://archive.thisishampshire.net/2001/6/25/73971.html

This is not just possession of a few photographs of young girls "accidentally" downloaded with adult porn. There is a discrepancy here.

[cheekylilgirl]

And the plot thickens once again... stir it up and yet the lumps still won't come out.

Guess, I am being a fence sitter on this one, I don't like to throw accusing stones when I don't really know the facts in full.

[alia]

"Stanfield, of Quob Lane, West End, pleaded guilty to 30 charges of making indecent photographs."

Source - http://archive.thisishampshire.net/2001/6/25/73971.html

This is not just possession of a few photographs of young girls "accidentally" downloaded with adult porn. There is a discrepancy here.

It could be a typo in the paper.
They do occur relatively often.

I'm not trying to defend him, but I think his sentence would have been much more severe if he had in fact participated in the making of those pictures.