Wow I come home to a conversation about spongebob
![Grin](http://phorum.mustnotbenamed.com/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
awesome lol.
I wasn't meaning to nit pick either. Just over in America, Maybe our standards are a bit looser than Australia's but by our standards that isn't over pg-13
![Smiley](http://phorum.mustnotbenamed.com/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
"If a movie is rated PG-13, then it may contain violence, some sexual content, and/or strong language. Children under 13 should have parental guidance; however, parental guidance is not legally enforced."
I know that's about movies, but I also don't know if Australia is a bit different
![Smiley](http://phorum.mustnotbenamed.com/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
But usually here, if something is rated pg-13 it's no biggie. It becomes a question when it hits NC-17, or rated r.
I work in retail, and when I worked with video games, I honestly only talked to maybe 10 people about game ratings. Because they asked. And I remember one lady specifically refusing to buy pokemon because I think it was rated pg-13 or E10+ one of the two, and her child wasn't old enough. I couldn't help but wonder:
A. Why pokemon has such a high rating.... I mean yeah there's simulated violence, but all it is with the video games is the pokemon thrust at each other and the other's health goes down
B. What was so wrong with it? I mean it's not like pokemon taught kids how to do crack, or buy prostitutes.
But that's another tangent for another conversation..... back on topic!!
![](http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j61/miss_sabrina/sims2/759990.jpg)
Maybe this should go in the ugly creations but when I first saw this I thought of flash dance, then I though of 80's strippers