You are 100% percent wrong. Did you even bother to look it up? Were you born an insensitive arrogant fuck wit, or did you go to school to gain that particular qualification?
Born that way, of course. My people consider sensitivity a weakness, and I see no reason why I should wish to indulge in such weakling behavior.
Did you even read my post?
I did, but your continuing willful disregard of basic physical laws doesn't give your ideas much bite.
They didn't find it until it was too late, yes removal of the tumour would have cured her, but again it was too late-obviously the school attended didn't teach you to read either.
Eh, see? Now if it were up to me, removing things would be the FIRST thing I'd suggest. If something is there and doesn't belong in the design specs, remove it. If something isn't there and DOES belong in the design specs, replace it. A rather simple concept, really, but eh, you know how it is, you always end up with a few extra parts everytime you take something apart and put it back together.
Here:http://www.patient.co.uk/showdoc/27000139/
Nothing in that entry indicates that this disease is able to violate conservation of mass. Mostly because that is impossible. You certainly may develop other issues from funny diseases, but weight gain or loss is purely controlled by mass intake, as per the *LAW* of Conservation of Mass.
Thanks Guys-I know what he's like-have had him many a time point and laugh at me from his VS days......but I suppose I'm a tad extra sensitive as its the 1st anniversary in May and its still quite raw. I can't believe I fell foul to his bait-the first time in about 2 yrs! :oops:
See? This is why I don't do sensitivity. Sensitivity is a weakness. In my family, such behavior is punished by beating, and if you cry, we beat you harder. A strict training regimen like that will guarantee that you, too, will develop a heart of stone and be ready to kill without favor or mercy.
PMBD
Author