I honestly don't know where you read any of that crap.
I have come to the conclusion that you are completely and utterly incapable of comprehending common human speech. If it doesn't have some fancy ripped-from-a-dictionary term used every other word then you're clueless as to what is really being said. Allow me to hold your hand and walk you through this, okay?
I will not be told to keep quiet by anyone in this joint or any forum for that matter.
This comment was likely brought on by comments such as this:
The ISZ, give it up!
Generally, when one tells another to 'give it up', it means that they are expressing their desire for the offender to cease whatever actions have offended them. Another way of saying 'give it up', in this situation, would be to say 'shut up'. Telling someone to 'shut up' is what one does when they wish the other would cease talking. This commonly occurs when one either doesn't know what they're talking about, they do know what they speak of but it is a topic that offends conflicting opinions, or when two people are hiding in a dark alleyway and hoping to jump the nearest passerby.
Indeed, telling someone to 'shut up' (or 'give it up') is a method of trying to silence them (or 'keep them quiet'). Therefore, The ISZ was not delusional in believing that he or she was being told to 'keep quiet' (or 'silenced').
I don't want you to like me so you stating that everyone hates me means nothing.
This comment was likely brought on by comments such as this:
The fact that you're so free about your claims that women over thirty are blah blah will make you a minority anywhere.
The hostile hint in this comment may not be readily obvious, and certainly not definite. However, considering context, the word 'minority' is likely being used as a derogatory term. It is seemingly used to say "your opinion is lesser", and upon comparing The ISZ to chauvinistic men in other countries (who are looked upon with severe dislike, or 'hate', by some) is seemingly used to say "you are lesser".
Since the majority of responses to The ISZ's comments have been negative, and very nearly all of them (if not all) have been tainted with malice, these comments could lead the poster of the minority comment to believe that The ISZ is the opposite of popular, which is unpopular. So it is possible that by saying "you are in the minority", the poster of said comment could have meant that The ISZ was on the unpopular side, and the unpopular side in this situation is treated with mild or severe dislike and mockery. Thus, 'hate'. So it is not delusional for The ISZ to believe that he or she was being told they were disliked (or 'hated') from a comment that, with the proper context and a little 'reading into things' (which is where one collects data from and not from the offender and uses it to examine the situation in which something questionable and otherwise innocent is being said), could lead to such a deduction.
On another topic, concerning the issue of 'sweeping generalizations':
Could you please go back and read what I said again. I do believe I used the words, "my experience" which means what I have personally experienced myself. No where in there did I say if was a fact. I do believe I ended it with, "this is not always the case". This is my experience from the forums and chat rooms I frequent.
If one did not partake in the exact same activity as the one who offers some information, or if one is unable to present evidence that would contradict the information, then the information is indisputable. In this case you are disputing that which is possibly indisputable. If you wish to prove guilty the one who, to this point, is innocent, then you must collect the data that would negate the defenses of the innocent. Since you likely cannot, or will not, then the 'experience' (or 'event one has personally witnessed') of The ISZ cannot be claimed false since you do not share the exact same 'experience' nor do you have any proof to show the 'experience' to be false.
As for your example:
"I have found that most of the people in my neighbourhood and at my job that are lazy and promiscuous are blacks. I don't know why this is, but I find them to be less intelligent than the whites. Of course this is not always the case. I do realize that other races can be annoying and ignorant."
This is a statement that, while highly insulting, cannot be proved false and thus must be assumed to be true for your area. Since you do not make the assumption that all blacks are lazy and promiscuous, then your comments cannot be classified as a 'sweeping generalization', but rather a 'statement of opinion based on personal experience'. It is an acceptable, while limited, truth, even if it is inappropriate and insensitive to declare. In your examples you did not call the appropriateness of The ISZ's statements into question, but rather whether or not they were generalizations. They were not, and neither was your example.
Dolt.
Edit for clarity on this last bit. 
PMBD
Author