More Smutty Than You: TSR's Hall of Shame

[EmilyTwitch]

Ugh, this makes me wanna throw up:



Now, compared to the cute stuff from Strawberry patch http://sumomo.modthesims2.com/member.php?u=78647, how could anyone pay for that shit??

And this is pay? It looks like a Maxis recolour! http://isc.thesimsresource.com/images/tmp/120/120339.jpg

[SBNao]

You know, there are enough perverts and freaks out there in the world, I've never been a big fan of sexualizing little girls. I've never really 'gotten' the clothes that expose flesh beyond a resonable, 'Hey it's hot! Let's wear shorts!' or 'Let's wear a pretty skirt!' sorta thing. The shirt is a little beyond what I find tasteful.

[ScopataFuori]

I can't believe someone would pay for this smut

At this point in life...I can believe it.

When I discovered, entirely by accident, that there's an entire fetish devoted to Barbie dolls dressed up in S&M gear and displayed in some most unladylike poses...I thought I'd seen it all. Then someone told me that there are individuals who are, shall we say...interested...in popping balloons, as a fetish.

The pervination of Sims doesn't surprise me. (gaaacckk....the "bear/gorilla" suit from one of the expansions...omg...now I know....) 

[ChaosInAMinor]

I dunno, weird fetishes like balloon popping and stuff don't bother me...furries aren't even that weird to me. I'm not into it, but, y'know...to each their own. I try to be open minded. One thing I can't be "open minded" about, however, is sexualising children. It's not okay, ever. Anyone under about 16 (and sometimes even people over) just aren't mentally matured enough for that kind of shit, especially when involving someone much older who is. It's a disgusting practice.

[dusdeedawn]

Why does that remind me of the horrible outfit Cher wore in her video for If I Could Turn Back Time?

  Just think, though, Cher had the thong up in her girly-regions. I can see it now...  "Coming soon: Front Wedgie Version!"  I'll bet the kiddies can't wait!   

[Panthpirate]

Ugh, this makes me wanna throw up:

<barf>

That makes me double nauseated, from both the slutty outfit and the fugly textures on it 

Edited because I'm tired and cant spell

[Viking Marta]

The poor baby...why do people do that?  Notice that the "model" doesn't even have hair...maybe the creator thinks that by de-genderizing the child, then sexualizing her is okay?  Not sure I can accept that reasoning.

As for the leather strap thing.....

[ScopataFuori]

One thing I can't be "open minded" about, however, is sexualising children. It's not okay, ever. Anyone under about 16 (and sometimes even people over) just aren't mentally matured enough for that kind of shit, especially when involving someone much older who is. It's a disgusting practice.

Agreed 100%. I'm shocked at some of the "real" clothes offered for sale for children, little girls in particular...and saddened that there's people who think it's somehow "cool" to dress a little girl in "sexy" outfits...not just "grownup" looking, but the ones that practically scream "sex".

 It bothers me that some of the clothes made for Sims children, are likewise suggestive, or worse. I can laugh at some of the gear for the adult Sims...like you said, to each their own. But to deliberately create "clubwear" for kids, even in the fantasy world of the Sims, makes me wonder what in the world the creator was thinking.

Arguably, these deliberately sexualized "child" Sims are contributing to the vile fantasies of pedophiles. In my opinion, there's no need for "sluttysexy" kids' clothes, either real or Sims. What's wrong with creating "cute" or "cool" childrens' clothes, instead?

/soapbox

[dusdeedawn]

I could argue with the 16 part of Chaos' post. Maturity is a variable thing. I believe that at 15, it was my prerogative to wear whatever the hell I wanted, so long as it wasn't considered 'indecent exposure' in a court of law.

[SoggyFox]

Agreed - besides, by that logic, some people could never have sex....mental maturity ranges so wildly, that using that as a basis is wrong.

[Aralie]

I don't know if this one has been posted yet, if it has sorry!



Gotta love how low it is. Everyone needs to see buttcrack.   And that pink color and the texture...EEEEW!  

[dusdeedawn]

Aw, see, a perfect example of indecent exposure! 

[Aralie]

Ugh it won't let me edit the post to add another *lovely* pic from the same creator...So sorry for spamming.



It's not as slutty...I mean...At least there's no buttcrackage...But it's just yuck!

[Pescado]

I could argue with the 16 part of Chaos' post. Maturity is a variable thing. I believe that at 15, it was my prerogative to wear whatever the hell I wanted, so long as it wasn't considered 'indecent exposure' in a court of law.

There's no 15 or 16. This is still *12*.

[deelink]

Anyone under about 16 (and sometimes even people over) just aren't mentally matured enough for that kind of shit, especially when involving someone much older who is. It's a disgusting practice.

I can't believe paedophilia has grown so much it is now considered a "practise" like bowling or cosplaying. I mean stripping and dildo parties are now practises too, which I don't particular have any feelings for nor agaisnt. But child porn?
It's pretty wretched really, like the paedophiles themselves. A miserable twisted excuse of human trash. *sigh*