PMBD PMBD
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
2024 April 28, 04:07:28

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
138712 Posts in 1637 Topics by 5282 Members
Latest Member: AlexanderPistoletov
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
31  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 December 03, 07:03:12
Marry me Pes!
32  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 December 03, 05:45:05
Let us know when we can head over to the ruins and P&L
33  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 December 02, 19:49:42
What really pisses me off is:
 
Quote
"...I'm really very concerned about this prior understanding that the community supposedly had with Kathy and Eric, the one that said that only server costs and domain fees were to be covered by donations and ad income. Obviously you can tell from what I wrote earlier that I don't think much of that approach..."

Supposedly? What we made it up? You don't think much of using the files in the only way we are legally allowed to? You don't think much of upholding the TOU to which we all agreed when installing the game - oh, wait, you never installed the game. So it's not his problem, it's ours. We're just too stupid to realize how much monies we could be making here, so Walt's going to fleece us to cover up his own management phail and move on. Uh, huh. Valuable life lesson in 3...2...
34  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 December 01, 03:38:42
I agree that it's a shitty thing to do, but it seems that there's no other option. If it were just spite, I'd say no way, but it seems like it's a kind of virtual self-defense - the only way to save the site - it's a moral conundrum.
35  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 December 01, 03:29:12
I'd say IF it's the only way to save it and IF it won't mean legal trouble for Pescado, then burn - but as has been said, wait till tomorrow to see if the traffic suddenly drops due to 12's going back to school.

Question - if Pes decided to burn it, will there be time for some of us to go back on and try and grab what remains - tutorials, files that are left, etc, just in case, or will that not be necessary?
36  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 30, 06:59:47
Pretty sure GP cleaned out her section personally. I think she's taking a break from the Sims for a bit.
37  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 23:40:43
Happy Birthday, Paden-cub.

To the person who was worried about contest stuff - and I'm too lazy and tired to go back and find out who you are - cat me if you want to - just talked to my sister, she grabbed a lot of the files from the contest area, so in the incredibly unlikely event that something goes wrong with Pes' efforts is that area, some of it, at least, is preserved. Have faith in Pescado and worry not.
38  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 21:31:30
Personally, I'm against a Walt name, as hopefully before too long (pleaseohpleaseohplease) nobody will remember who Walt is.
39  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 16:25:44
I put up a notice at NS
40  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 16:02:12
Quote
1 ~ This site's not the only one doing this. 2 ~ Evidently you think everyone's going to catch Pes' little statement already 2 pages back and are following it. 3 ~ No spouting on my part, I've got 3 years invested over there. Can you say the same?

Again - bite me- you're not the only one with a vested interest - and I've been around MTS and InSim on and off since day one. SO why don't you quit acting like all of this is a plot to make your life miserable and do something useful, like go post at other sites telling people to get off InSim until further notice?
41  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 15:40:17
The community is part of the goods, IMHO - assuming everyone wants to move along with the pillaged site and regroup.
42  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 15:29:44
Then the rest ought to just kick back and let you go about it...

That's what we're doing

edit -
Oh, and BTW
Quote
I'm not thinking of myself in this at all but of the friends I have at both sites, so quit trying to act like this is some kind of magnanimous action by most of you. If it is you're sure showing it in a strange way.
Bite me. We were grabbing stuff to preserve it for everyone and make sure it was available to be put back up by Pes. Not cause we wanted it all to ourselves - I have no interest in half the stuff I grabbed.  Magnanimous - not really, just trying to be helpful. You may not have noticed, but you're not the only one who got burned here.
43  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 15:25:17
And, of course, let's never forget the final step:
4. Worshipping Yours Truly.

hmmm ... you might have a problem there Pescado .. you have to realise we don't all universally adore you  Shocked

If Pescado can crash and burn Wallyworld while preserving it's goods for the rest of us, I will worship him to my dying breath.
44  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 15:20:47
Feh - I've visited Insim since it opened - I just don't talk much cause I'm anti-social. And actually, those of us who were snarfing the files we were trying to divide and conquer as much as possible as well as keep track of who had what, to avoid needless overlap. But we all bow to Pes superior pillaging capabilities. We want to help, not get in the way.
45  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Insim under new management! on: 2008 November 29, 15:00:37
stepping back and being patient, sir.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.067 seconds with 18 queries.