PMBD PMBD
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
2024 April 27, 00:23:40

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
138712 Posts in 1637 Topics by 5282 Members
Latest Member: AlexanderPistoletov
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
31  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: TSR: In Ur Accounts, Deletin Ur Stuffs! on: 2009 April 01, 22:01:55
Sounds like an American Congressperson when they are caught with their hands in the cookie jar.  "I am innoccent; they are all lying about me, so ignore their truths and listen to my lies so I can get re-elected and keep stealling you blind."

Yep, I tend to agree. And to think I still have a little over 2 months left on my subscription at that POS site. Angry Maybe I should put it to good use... Wink

You should. I'm pretty sure there's a sticky here that lists any of the people to contact.

Incidentally, I find it interesting that Johan initially showed up and prefaced all of his statements with "I don't know". Now he seems to be taking the position that he's actually very much in the know, but can't directly answer anything here because it's all one big sekkrit.  Roll Eyes
32  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: TSR: In Ur Accounts, Deletin Ur Stuffs! on: 2009 March 31, 23:20:16
I don't know exactly what he meant by fixing the loophole but we don't have any reason to believe that our members login details have been compromised.

Why do all of your responses seem to start with "I don't know"?

I've pretty much been staying out of this thread because I'm not one of the "insiders," so to speak. I just don't have all the information on everything, so I'm not sure how relevant any of my comments are. You seem to be in the same boat, Johan, so I'm not sure what it is you're trying to do here.
33  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Your Prettiest Freesite Creation Find: Round Two (Apparently) on: 2009 March 28, 05:34:12
So normally I'm a huge fan of "liberated" maxis content anyway (more clothing options FTW!), and the fact that these are for guys is just an added bonus. Smiley



http://fantasyrogue.livejournal.com/27691.html

She also has several other Maxis-separated downloads on her LJ as well.
34  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 24, 19:26:17
On the other hand EA does lose money from supporting paysites.  If someone is shelling out 100$ a year, or worse a month [it is possible too] to get all the nifty pay-crap, then they are less likely to shell out the 100$ to EA for the expansions and stuff packs and now the official paysite.

So, if Blizzard can go, 'This is dividing the community, cut it out.' when its not affecting their bottom line, but just overall player enjoyment, then why the fuck can't EA do the same when it is going to cost them a lot more money?

This is the same question I have had for ages. Financially, it doesn't make sense for EA to allow paysites to exist, especially with current economic issues. Their unwillingness to step in is pretty baffling to me, actually.
35  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 12, 03:39:20
Does anybody know if Drea is the same maxoid who pitched a fit about the Ikea lamps over at MATY?

Edited because I accidentally hit "quote" before. *smacks forehead*
36  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 12, 01:48:41
It feels like a direct comment to the discussion earlier in this thread. She must have been sneaking around in here. That's bone-chilling.

Wouldn't be surprised, I'm getting the feeling that she's got a personal mission set out in her head.  Roll Eyes It is creepy, but it's not anything that wasn't being stated over at the BBS anyway. Personally, I thought it was kind of funny that she thought basically adding "I'm not lying!" to her post was somehow going to add legitimacy.
37  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Your Ugliest Paysite Creation Find: Round Two. on: 2009 March 10, 05:49:41
EA (or maybe Maxis still existed back then?) has had a history of having CC creators make things for the Sims games. I specifically remember them doing some sort of clothing contest for NL, but I believe they did it all the way back in TS1 days. What's interesting is that AFAIK, they've always been free creators up until now. Well, that and the fact that they were never as ugly as those godforsaken lamps. *shudders*
38  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 06, 22:53:12
Has anybody else noticed IdiotDrea's modification to her post? I find it interesting that she felt the need to add a "no, really!" edit to her own post. If this really is coming from the "management and legal team", why exactly would they need (or want) to speak through somebody that can't even spell the word "please"?
39  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Your Prettiest Freesite Creation Find: Round Two (Apparently) on: 2009 March 05, 21:56:26
Now take a look at this Criquette update....and tell me that sharing isn't caring Cheesy

[snipped]

and you can find it right here on MTS2

My neighborhoods' deco has improved vastly since I discovered Criquette. Cheesy
40  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 05, 21:52:19
Food for thought... if this really is the legal loophole that EA games is going to jump through to be able to protect and worship TSR's and other paysites asses, the booty might end up making paysites legal.  Follow me on this one, I know that sounds strange, but, techically, someone charging for content could say, "I'm only charging you for the convenience of downloading my stuff from my website.  If you want my stuff for free, go to the booty." 

Edit for: Clarification.

This is actually a valid point, not that I'm advocating we yank down the booty.

Does the fact that many (I say many because I'm thinking especially of Ren Sim when I say this, since she is fine with her stuff being in the booty) paysites don't want their stuff in the booty matter at all, though? This is a pretty convoluted loophole if EA is actually relying on it, and I'm trying to wrap my head around it. I guess it's possible that this is why EA hasn't come out against filesharing, although I would argue that if that is their stance on the thing, linking to PMBD should be perfectly legit at the "official" site.

ETA: Also, doesn't that mean that in order to continue charging for their downloads, sites like TSR would have to provide their downloads to the booty as well? I'd certainly love to see Thomass's expression during that conversation.
41  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 04, 03:30:59
Actually, I think he was calling Numenor "the greatest of us", not himself. I could be misreading it, though.

What I don't understand is why he feels so personally targeted. "The pirates have been hating me good and strong"? Really? Because I spend plenty of time lurking around this forum, and this is the first time I've even heard of the guy. I certainly don't see any "We Hate Beosboxboy!" threads around here either.

This guy just doesn't understand irony at all, does he? The "artist's rights" bit made me laugh-- because obviously what he considers to be the artist's rights totally overrides what the EULA states. Hasn't the guy figured out yet that he completely misread (and totally overinflated) the BBS post?
42  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 03, 23:42:54
Two years later, Numenor heartily agrees with a sentiment of a very adamant paycreator that all pirates are now wrong, even though the EULA has not changed, and that we should also all get asscancer.

This is why I was pretty astonished at the heated reply, assuming it really was Numenor. He has the undeniable right to be angry (although I would also hope that on some level he understands why the decision was made to put it in there). Even keeping that in mind, wishing that everyone who considers themselves a "pirate" gets cancer seems pretty over the top, not to mention unfair to those who really have dealt with cancer before.

I'm hoping this wasn't the real Numenor, personally.
43  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 03, 20:29:35
I thought the screencap in this post at GoS makes for an interesting read:

http://www.digitalperversion.net/gardenofshadows/index.php?topic=10534.msg299874#msg299874

BeosBoxBoy and Numenor, you are class A fuckwits.

I just saw that, and honestly, I was pretty surprised at Numenor. He's basically a free creator with one donation item, and the only reason it's even there is consistency. It's not like this is the "Numenor Must Be Destroyed" club or anything.  Roll Eyes

Also, you have to love the irony of the statement-- after all, he's bashing "pirates of any kind", yet MaxoidDrea essentially just gave pirates the go-ahead to ignore whatever parts of the EULA they want.
44  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 03, 05:11:06
Just because I am curious, although I understand if nobody has an answer for this: what exactly would Pescado do if EA did come out and declare themselves best buddies with paysites? Not that I think that is likely, mind you.
45  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Ea makes statement March 2 making paysites ok? on: 2009 March 03, 02:51:41

Impressive. Hopefully there are BBSers who will read that and finally understand just how detrimental paysites are to the community, as well as downright evil. (Looking at you, TSR.) There are too many people there that STILL do not know of the iffy tactics used by many paysites.

Incidentally, even if EA came out and declared paysites A-OK I'm not sure I could ever support them, though I doubt they ever will anyway. Paysites seem heavily destructive to the community, and a lot of them strike me as pretty shady, honestly. (Once again, TSR comes to mind.)
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.354 seconds with 18 queries.