You guys keep saying he's not acting like a teenager. I'd probably do something along the same lines....if I hadn't realized I wasn't legally binded of course. My parents don't know there's an online Sims community. If I had a site, they wouldn't know. They're computer-paranoid. They'd be the last people I turned to.

If I were him, I'd stick Delphy with the bill and book it.

Somebody needs to tell Nathan to run. Grab his site and run to a new host.

The account is in Delphy's name. Nathan was (may still be) a minor when the account was created. Therefore, he has no legal obligation to pay Delphy or LT anything. Delphy *could* try to sue, but he'd have no legal ground to stand on.

I'm sure that nightie is photo-skinned, not stolen. There are several pieces I recognize from Zadie from real pictures.

It's not Emilie. She's a friend of mine. She closed BE because of personal reasons. I can't see her ever opening a pay site. If you will remember, she took her donation set a while before she ever closed her site....

Attacking someone's work is transitively attacking them. I didn't mean that you can't point out when something is low quality, but this is not bad. It's not that original, but it still looks nice. And, how exactly did I switch concepts by saying that I was defending the creator but not pay sites in general?

Why do you guys see fit to attack every pay site's quality? Arguments are more persuasive if they're presented in a mature way - sans personal attacks and name-calling. I happen to think these skins, while wildly over-priced, are of good quality. At least, some of them are photo-skinned, but still HQ. If I didn't know that it was wrong to charge for CC and had the money to waste, I'd download this stuff. I'd be willing to be that she'd have quite a following if the site was free. [Just so you know, I wasn't defending the principle of pay sites, only this site owner as a person.]