I'd like to post about a portion of the EULA

"You will not represent that your site is endorsed or approved by or affiliated with EA or our licensors or that any other content on your site is endorsed or approved by or affiliated with EA or our licensors."


Couldn't TSRs latest threat be deemed a violation of this portion of the EULA since they state :

"Despite this clarification, your customer continues his defamation. In short, EA states that our business model is NOT in violation of their EULA."



This may be somantics but isn't Thomas Isaksson saying that EA or their licensors are endorsing and/or approving of TSR and other paysites?