What are you talking about? Screaming at those damn kids to get off the lawn is a time-honored activity running back to when lawns were first invented, shortly after the invention of dirt.

I dunno why Lizard thinks his IP matches Lyric's. It doesn't. Not at all.

I don't think Rose is talking about us.

There's a few tricks you can try, like forcing excessive mechanical wear or wiping the BIOS, but none of those can be assured of "completely destroying" a computer. The only kind of hacking I've ever heard of that can do that kind of damage involves an axe.

New Killmark up on the front page.

BOOYEAH! I'm doing my victory dance!

From what I can tell...

...is not the sound of a successful point being made.

VICTOLY!!

I don't think she has a point. As far as I'm concerned, she runs a paysite. By closing the paysite, I've accomplished the stated objective of "Paysites Must Be Destroyed". She hasn't "made a point". I'm doing my victory dance! Clearly if there is a point to this, it's the wrong point from their perspective.

Well, nobody here modified anything. We post the loot in its original form with credit.

Eh. That must have shipped with the board software. You don't think *I* wrote that, did you? I'll make up something more amusing once I find it.

UPDATE: The relevant changes have been performed. Henceforth to remain on the board, you must agree that today is a good day for cheese. And also be able to convincingly pretend to be older than 12.

The problem with this person is that she knows NOTHING about hacking in any form, whereas I do. Hackers cannot casually destroy any site at whim on a moment's notice. Otherwise the Internet would have imploded messily by now. SOME sites may be vulnerable to such a trivial action, but no serious site is so easy, and to attack a site run by other hackers? Even if you succeed, you've just revealed your hand to the enemy. I'm not going to sit around and bemoan "WOE IS ME". I'm going to shoot back. While a "hacker" could potentially knock a site offline through brute force, that requires that one acquire and then use a sufficiently large botnet to overwhelm the target site, and is at best a temporary nuisance and causes no actual damage. Such acts are not regarded as serious threats for noncommercial entities like us, since we do not have any business to lose by being offline for a day or two. The fact of the matter is that I laugh at their feeble threats. Besides, even if accomplishing the destruction of the site data or even the physical destruction of the server were plausible actions, I have more dirt on them than they do on me.

HChangeri is nothing more than a small petulant child trying to play with toys far too advanced for her. It is a pathetically humorous site, like a small child flailing his fists in rage at a larger opponent, only to be balked by a hand firmly placed on the head.

You may all point and laugh now.


And it just got nuked.

What's funniest and most ironic of all is this "John Galt" she wishes to emulate is the friend of the world's most infamous pirate in that book. ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!

Field reports suggest it hasn't actually HAPPENED yet.

I use FurryFox and RefControl. All Referrers are filtered and forged to simply say the target site. You should, too. Referrers are a major security leak.