PMBD PMBD
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
2024 May 06, 05:11:32

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
138712 Posts in 1637 Topics by 5282 Members
Latest Member: AlexanderPistoletov
* Home Help Search Calendar Login Register
  Show Posts
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46
661  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Poor Atwat.... on: 2008 June 19, 23:35:35
Brain??  It's been my experience that the brain has little influence at those times. It basically just maintains life support systems until it's needed again. Sometimes longer.
662  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Poor Atwat.... on: 2008 June 19, 23:17:33
Exactly, there was no mention of preference. I thereby stand by my nomination of said homo for not wanting.

FYI, unwanted hummer is an oxymoron.
663  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Poor Atwat.... on: 2008 June 19, 22:51:11
And a woman raping a man? Oral against his will? Not to be perverted, but what guy would turn that down??? lol

Richard Simmons?
664  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Poor Atwat.... on: 2008 June 07, 21:33:32
Featured Artists supposedly make no more than $300 per month. *goes back to lurking*
No! All gelydhs must post MOAR! -  Cheesy

Yes, because all  A_G & G's rock!
665  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: The teutonic TWATS! on: 2008 June 03, 14:32:02
Ya'll ain't Andy Warhol so enough with charging for the soup cans.

Yeah but he did charge, and that is an important point.  His SoupCans weren't free if you wanted to buy one.  Heck Roy Lichtenstein copied other comics pretty much verbatim. 

While Birgit is using Ikea's (among others) designs, she is neither competing with Ikea, nor is she diluting their trademark.  As in the case of Warhol, or SNL doing a Harry Potter skit,  the models could reasonably considered a parody and therefore protected under fair use.  Plus she is not even calling her stuff Ikea as far as I know.  If I made a "subway" looking set and called it "simway" I don't think there is a damn thing subway could do to me, even if I was making money.

I agree Birgit is a twat and all, and she mostly does a disservice to the great designers who designed the objects in the first place.  Also she does a disservice to the 3D model sites she originally pirates those meshes from (again - who sell all those same designs and make much higher profit than Birgit) by not taking the time and care to properly transfer them into something usable and nice looking for the game.  However, I still don't think Ikea has much of a case.   They may contact her and she may just decide to remove it but if she didn't and it came down to push or shove I don't think there is anything Ikea can do.

Again -  Phillipe Starks, like many designers such as the Eames, Corbusier, Jacobsen, all their designs knocked off in the actual real world, in furniture where it actually hurts them (ok some of them are dead now - but still).  Even Ikea does this - to them!  I doubt they really care about any sim furniture.  Heck my diningroom chairs the "Jake" Chairs from Room and Board (a very well know and respected company) and are knockoffs of the Series 7 Chair by Arne Jacobsen.  Neither Jacobsen or Republic of Fritz Hanson who owns the rights get any money from Room and Board and they can't do a damn thing about them selling the obvious copy so long as they don't call it a "Series 7".  Yet they are supposed to be able do something about models or sims .packages?  I don't think so. 

ETA: Stark, personally would not probably care, as he is supposedly "retiring" in two years and apparently regrets designing products that lend toward wasting resources, and I have heard other designs kinda nod he is going off the deep end.

You know what, you're absolutely right. Was Warhol an opportunist, yes.  I'm sure we've all been in a faux Corbusier office, have some faux Stark objets d'arts around the house, a Monet poster maybe, the ubiquitous Vuitton handbag,  my €10 Armani sunglasses. It's all there, and I have no problems with that. Do the creators of the originals have a right to a problem, oh ya. They can deal with it however they see fit. My problem is the pirater claiming copyright protection, because that's just quite frankly ridiculous. It's one thing to do it, it's another to say you own it.

I don't care if it's Ikea or whatever, just drop the pretense of having created it and getting pissed because someone else is pirating your pirate.
666  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: The teutonic TWATS! on: 2008 June 03, 02:29:45
For me the best part...now they're pissed because of the charges.

At least they're getting accustomed to the camera's which will come in handy later, cause you know they're end up on Jerry Springer before they're 20.
667  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: The teutonic TWATS! on: 2008 June 03, 01:51:20
Ya, this is one of my biggest issues with these people. Cashing in on an somebody else's hard earned image, then having the audacity to claim proprietary rights. FUCK OFF! You wanna claim authorship, think of something on your own, figure out how to make it by yourself, then put it out there and see if one other person in this world cares. Ya'll ain't Andy Warhol so enough with charging for the soup cans.

Make it if you want, call it an homage, and share it freely, but it's not your property to sell. It's like a thief calling for justice because he got pick pocketed of money he just stole.


668  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: More Smutty Than You: TSR's Hall of Shame on: 2008 May 23, 03:24:12
No, way too cold.

This looks nice.

669  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Random rant that was on the Booty shopping list on: 2008 May 22, 01:30:31
The prices are extortion and the threats are insulting. Especially so, when you know what you're doing is illegal, you're just cashing in on someone else's ideas to begin with, and not just once but twice.

I favour a Final Fantasy flounce forthwith.
670  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Carla Niven must be destroyed! on: 2008 May 20, 22:33:25
I may have Peggy hair, but at least I'm not wearing Carla Niven.

671  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Carla Niven must be destroyed! on: 2008 May 19, 23:07:49
My parents wanted another girl, so my middle name is Charlotte, but at least I'm not wearing Carla Niven
672  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: Carla Niven must be destroyed! on: 2008 May 19, 21:39:38
Yesterday, I stapled myself in the eye...but at least I'm not wearing Carla Niven
673  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: More Smutty Than You: TSR's Hall of Shame on: 2008 May 17, 16:53:49
So yaaa, I had a little Picture Trail accident...don't even ask.  Suffice it to say, sometimes I do really stupid things when I'm not paying attention. Moving on.
Everything is now returned, shiny and new, in all it's questionable glory. That's why you'll see that all my posts have been edited. Please accept my apologizes on behalf of my suckiness, and do resume your regularly scheduled programming. Have a nice day.

This message has been pre-recorded
674  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: More Smutty Than You: TSR's Hall of Shame on: 2008 May 16, 19:12:37
*snip*
*snip*

Thank you for clarifying that. I really had no intention to be accusatory, I'm far from a prude and definitely not interested in a witch hunt. I would never never, make an accusation like that unless I was 100% convinced in it's truth, and had the evidence to back it up. It was just the combination and the context that struck me as less than appropriate. Aside from that, it wasn't his/her/it first time commenting on sexy young lingerie. Seeing as this is about TSR, and they are proudly PG13, I felt drawing attention to the situation warranted mention.
675  The Pirate Ship / ARR! / Re: More Smutty Than You: TSR's Hall of Shame on: 2008 May 15, 04:08:34
Is that a top or a tattoo?
Pages: 1 ... 43 44 [45] 46
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 18 queries.