I don't think she was ever denying the existence of artists who do create for a living.
Nope, I wasn't. My mommy-in-law is one.
And despite the fact that most comparisons regarding this and tangible things (bake sales, paints, et cetera) don't really work, people still draw their arguments from them.
Hmmm... Maybe it's just me, and I'm being really dense (which is known to happen on occasion), but I fail to see how the comparison doesn't work. I paint and draw for a hobby, you (the theoretical you, not
you you) sculpt stuff as a hobby, Joe Schmoe makes Sims2 stuff as a hobby. What right do any of us have to charge money for something that someone could
learn how to do for themselves? Especially when that hobby is basically stealing someone else's hard work for their own greedy-ass monetary gain? At what point does a hobby cease being a hobby? When you make money from it - at that point, don't you think it becomes a profession? At what point does this profession become thievery? Well, when you're charging ridiculous prices for A: stolen code and B: something people could learn to do for themselves.
(Did that make any sense? I've been out in the 95F sun for the past 3 1/2 hours. My brain may be fried...)
Nope, it didn't make sense, too much sun
None of us shouldn't really work at all. There's money enough for us all, to be lazy is healthy. Do you like your mommy-in-law by the way?