TSR Sharing your infomation!

[sherrie]

More than just USERNAMES, and SO NOT restricted to just 2 of your featured artists posting it -  is it a$$hole? and only YOU can see it right?



Hell, Toma$$hole, You gave ATWAT access to this, that alone means anyone with a internet connection and mailbox probably read it.

[mando]

Why is it that TSR always seems to forget that people here save screenshots like they're planning to paper their walls with them?

[Paden]

You mean to say that you're the only one who isn't, mando?!

[SoggyFox]

I don't, but then, I never had access to this stuff, either.

[mando]

You mean to say that you're the only one who isn't, mando?!

Oh Paden, of course not! You should well know that I'm using them to tile my floors instead.

[Paden]

Oh, that's right, silly me to have forgotten! Sorry!

[calalily]

Well that doesn't stand up to logic.  If they took privacy very seriously, they wouldn't disclose the real names of these people - I mean if only FAs see it, what is the point? So they can be double banned from TSR?

Thomass is a poor liar.

[Paleoanth]

Hell, Toma$$hole, You gave ATWAT access to this, that alone means anyone with a internet connection and mailbox probably read it.

Wasn't he also involved in the Rose sharing of names and whatnot?  That means it wasn't just TSR staff and FA's (which is horrible enough). 

[deelink]

Oh Thomass, how does it feel to have your so called argument being shred to pieces?
I am still pissed off he exposed members such as Bigtruckgirl and Ferris (and many others I know in the Sims Community, REAL contributors and lovely generous people)
What sort of right does that fucktard have? Hmm, let's see, NONE.
Massive. Epic. Phail.

[Jojoba]

Wasn't he also involved in the Rose sharing of names and whatnot?  That means it wasn't just TSR staff and FA's (which is horrible enough). 

He was yes, and I would presume that Rose is involved in that thread somehow.

And also note how many FAs and staff TSR have - they have over 60 FAs, and loads of exFAs..and from doing a quick glance, there is about 15 staff at the forum. So if you were going to alone go with the current FAs and Staff, thats 75 people. If you then add on all exFAs and exStaff..then the number gets huge, and you realise exactly how many have had access to that forum and therefore could have seen that thread. Then have a look at what paysites the FAs run, and therefore those paysites may be involved in sharing information; LianaSims, Habitat43, Birgit43, PureSims, muranomobilia, OpenHouseSims, 37Sims, sims2studio, TschibiSims (she had some donation sets on her site, from memory..)...And that does not involve paysites which exFAs run/did run.

'Private' forum does not mean there are few people involved. A large number of people have access to it, that we know of..may well be that some SAs can see it (a few SAs run paysites) and other paysite creators/owners, such as Rose. Thomas is attempting to make it look like this is being over exaggerated, when really its not. A lot of people had access to personal information that should not be shared. End of.

[Pescado]

See, our name policy here is even more simple:
I have no name. You have no name. We all have no names.

[Missbonbon]

Thomass is a dumbass. Obviously the forum wasn't that freaking private if we have screenshots from it. 

See, our name policy here is even more simple:
I have no name. You have no name. We all have no names.

Well slap me silly and call me Sally.

[Yaardarm Monkey II]

ok....I call you Sally   

[SnarkyShark]

So what I still don't understand is where he gets off saying those people were "stealing" when they had subscriptions. They paid for their downloads. That's not breaking any law, Thomass, you pathetic whore. However, when you, being the sniveling little pissant that you were born to be, turn around and MAKE PUBLIC the personal information of your PAYING members, you're crossing into some pretty dicey legal territory.

You really need to develop a conscience, you empty bitch.

[Missbonbon]

So what I still don't understand is where he gets off saying those people were "stealing" when they had subscriptions. They paid for their downloads. That's not breaking any law, Thomass, you pathetic whore. However, when you, being the sniveling little pissant that you were born to be, turn around and MAKE PUBLIC the personal information of your PAYING members, you're crossing into some pretty dicey legal territory.

You really need to develop a conscience, you empty bitch.

Because he has a case of the dumbs. I wouldn't talk to him because it might be contagious.

To me stealing is person A walks into a store, grabs a product and puts it into their pocket. Well person B catches person A and turns them into the cops and goes to jail for stealing. I would love for Thomass to come here and explain how people who paid a full subscription cost for pixels was stealing.

To me it would make more sense if person A bought tsr items, and gave them to person B. Well person C (Thomass) catches person B with said items and bans them.

Then it would make more sense on how he could say they are stealing, but it would still be ridiculous.

ok....I call you Sally  

Bwahaha I shall forever now be Sally Bonbons!